🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.